Communication Assignment Sample For Singapore Students
Posted on: 16th Nov 2022

SCO111 Reasoning Like A Sceptic SUSS Assignment Sample Singapore

The SCO111 Reasoning Like A Sceptic course is designed to introduce you to the basics of informal logic and reasoning. The aim of the course is to help you develop skills in analyzing and evaluating arguments, as well as thinking critically about claims made in everyday life. The course will cover topics such as the structure of arguments, fallacies, and how to use evidence. By the end of the course, you should be able to confidently analyze and evaluate arguments, as well as identify when someone is using fallacious reasoning.

Checkout Solved SUSS SCO111 Reasoning Like A Sceptic Assignment Answers in Singapore

At myassignmenthelp.sg, we understand the importance of academic assignments and the challenges students face while completing them. We are here to provide comprehensive assistance to students in Singapore, including help with various types of assignments such as TMA, TOA , FYP, PCOQ, as well as individual and group-based assignments.

Whether you need assistance with the SCO111 exam, SCO111 PCOQ , or SCO111 questions and answers, our experienced tutors are ready to guide you. We have provided you with a SCO111 assignment example to provide you reference about our solutions.

In this section, we are discussing some assigned tasks. These are:

SUSS SCO111 Assignment Task 1: State the different parts of an argument.

An argument is a set of statements, one of which (the conclusion) is claimed to follow from the others (the premises). The job of an argument is to convince its audience that the conclusion follows from the premises. In order to do this, an arguer must make sure that the premises are true and that the conclusion logically follows from them.

There are three main parts to every argument: 1) The premise or premises, 2) The conclusion, and 3) The warrant.

  1. Premises are just statements that provide support for the conclusion. They can be factual statements, opinions, or assumptions. In order for an argument to be valid, its premises must be true. However, even if the premises are all true, the argument may still be weak if the connection between the premises and the conclusion is not strong enough.
  2. The conclusion is the statement that the arguer is trying to convince you of. In order for an argument to be valid, the conclusion must logically follow from the premises. That is, if the premises are all true, then the conclusion must also be true.
  3. The warrant is the part of the argument that connects the premises to the conclusion. This is what allows you to go from the premises to the conclusion. In order for an argument to be valid, the warrant must be sound. That is, the warrant must be a valid form of reasoning (e.g. deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, etc.) and it must be applied correctly.

Assignment Task 2: Explain the roles of the different parts of an argument.

The role of premises: The premises of an argument are the evidence or reasons that are given in support of the conclusion. The premises are intended to show that the conclusion is likely to be true, or at least more plausible than if the premises were not given.

The role of the conclusion: The conclusion of an argument is the claim that is being made based on the evidence or reasons given in the premises. The conclusion is what the argument is trying to show.

The role of warrant: The warrant is the connection between the premises and the conclusion of an argument. The warrant is what allows you to go from the evidence or reasons given in the premises to the conclusion of the argument. Without a warrant, an argument would just be a list of claims with no clear connection between them.

SUSS SCO111 Assignment Task 3: Identify different types of arguments.

There are many different types of arguments, but they can all be classified into two general categories: deductive arguments and inductive arguments.

Deductive arguments are those in which the conclusion is supposed to follow logically from the premises. That is, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. If the premises of a deductive argument are not all true, then the argument is said to be invalid.

Inductive arguments are those in which the conclusion is supposed to be supported by the premises, but is not necessarily logically entailed by them. That is, even if the premises of an inductive argument are all true, the conclusion might still be false. Inductive arguments are said to be strong or weak. A strong inductive argument is one in which the conclusion is very likely to be true if the premises are all true. A weak inductive argument is one in which the conclusion is only somewhat likely to be true if the premises are all true.

There are many other types of arguments, such as abductive arguments, analogical arguments, statistical arguments, and so on. But all of these can be classified as either deductive or inductive.

Assignment Task 4: Conclude sensibly.

When writing your conclusion, you should always keep in mind what your goal is. Is your goal to simply summarize the argument? Or is your goal to show that the argument is strong or weak? Or is your goal to show that the argument is valid or invalid?

Your conclusion should always be clear and concise. It should also be consistent with the rest of your argument.

  • If your goal is simply to summarize the argument, then you should just restate the conclusion in your own words.
  • If your goal is to show that the argument is strong or weak, then you should say whether or not you think the premises support the conclusion.
  • If your goal is to show that the argument is valid or invalid, then you should say whether or not you think the premises logically entail the conclusion.

Assignment Task 5: Paraphrase arguments.

Arguments are often most effective when they are stated succinctly and clearly. When writing an argument, it is important to paraphrase the main points of the argument in order to make them easier for the reader to understand. Paraphrasing can also help persuasive essay topics focus the argument and make it more persuasive. In general, it is best to paraphrase arguments that are complex or difficult to follow.

By breaking down the argument into its key components, the reader will be able to follow the reasoning more easily. Additionally, paraphrasing can help to highlight the most important points of the argument, making them more likely to stick in the reader’s mind. Ultimately, paraphrasing is a valuable tool for making arguments more clear and more effective.

SUSS SCO111 Assignment Task 6: Evaluate arguments.

In order to evaluate an argument, you must first understand what the argument is trying to prove. The argument will have one or more premises and a conclusion. The premises are the evidence or reasons given in support of the conclusion. The conclusion is the main point that the argument is trying to prove.

Once you understand what the argument is trying to prove, you can then start to evaluate the strength of the argument. There are many different ways to do this, but some common methods include looking at whether or not the premises are actually true and whether or not they support the conclusion. Additionally, you can look at whether or not the argument is valid or invalid. A valid argument is one in which the premises logically entail the conclusion. An invalid argument is one in which the premises do not logically entail the conclusion.

When evaluating an argument, it is important to be as objective as possible. You should also try to consider all of the different ways that the argument could be interpreted. Arguments are often open to interpretation, so it is important to try to consider all of the different ways that the argument could be interpreted.

Ultimately, you should make a judgement about whether or not you think the argument is strong or weak. A strong argument is one in which the premises provide good evidence for the conclusion. A weak argument is one in which the premises do not provide good evidence for the conclusion.

Buy SUSS SCO111 Reasoning Like A Sceptic Assignment Solutions from Sg Helpers!

The assignment sample discussed above is based on SCO111 Reasoning Like A Sceptic. If you need assignment help in Singapore then no need to worry, Myassignmenthelp.sg is here to help you with your assignments. We have a team of experienced and qualified writers who can provide you with the best quality assignment help services. You can also say our experts to write my assignment in Singapore.

We provide assignment help services for all subjects and topics. Whether you need help with essays, research papers, a thesis, or dissertations, we can help you get the best grades. We also offer editing and proofreading services to make sure that your assignments are error-free and meet all the requirements of your professors.

You can also see the SCO113 Why Work Assignment Sample to get an idea of the quality of work our experts provide. You can get in touch with our customer support team to get more information about our homework writing services or to place an order. So, what are you waiting for? Get in touch with us today and get the best quality assignment help in Singapore.

No Need To Pay Extra
  • Turnitin Report

    $10.00
  • Proofreading and Editing

    $9.00
    Per Page
  • Consultation with Expert

    $35.00
    Per Hour
  • Live Session 1-on-1

    $40.00
    Per 30 min.
  • Quality Check

    $25.00
  • Total
    Free

New Special Offer

Get 30% Off

UP TO 15 % DISCOUNT

Get Your Assignment Completed At Lower Prices

Plagiarism Free Solutions
100% Original Work
24*7 Online Assistance
Native PhD Experts
Hire a Writer Now
My Assignment Help SG Services
My Assignment Help SG

Rated 4.9/5 Based on 22945 Singaporean Students